Non-partisan | Research-based | Expert Contributors
⚖️ Policy & Legislation

The Open Government Directive Explained

Analysis of the landmark 2009 directive and its impact on federal transparency.

DRK
Dr. Robert Kim
||11 min read

Content Quality Assurance

Last updated:
Expert reviewed by Dr. Robert Kim
Fact-checked for accuracy

Origins of the Directive

On January 21, 2009, President Obama's first full day in office, he issued a memorandum on Transparency and Open Government. This memorandum directed agencies to embrace transparency, participation, and collaboration as the foundation of an open government. It set the stage for the December 2009 Open Government Directive that would operationalize these principles.

Key Requirements

The Open Government Directive established specific requirements for federal agencies:

  • Publish government information online in open formats
  • Improve the quality of government information
  • Create and institutionalize a culture of open government
  • Create an enabling policy framework for open government
  • Develop and publish Open Government Plans
  • Flag high-value datasets for priority release

Data.gov and Open Data

The directive accelerated the development of Data.gov as the central hub for federal open data. Agencies were required to identify high-value datasets and publish them in machine-readable formats. This systematic approach to data release transformed government information from scattered documents into structured, accessible resources.

Impact on Federal Operations

The directive fundamentally changed how agencies approached information management. Chief Information Officers gained new responsibilities for open government. Agencies designated Open Government leads to coordinate transparency efforts. Annual reporting requirements created accountability for progress.

Lasting Legacy

While subsequent administrations have approached open government differently, the directive's institutional changes persist. Data.gov continues to operate and grow. Agency open government infrastructure remains in place. The expectation that government data should be publicly accessible has become normalized.

Lessons Learned

The directive's implementation revealed both possibilities and limitations. Executive action can rapidly change government practices, but sustained commitment requires legislative backing. Cultural change takes longer than policy change. Technology alone cannot achieve transparency without accompanying process reform.

Key Takeaways

  • The 2009 Open Government Directive operationalized transparency, participation, and collaboration.
  • Agencies were required to publish open data, develop plans, and institutionalize open government.
  • Data.gov became the central hub for federal open data publication.
  • The directive created lasting institutional changes in federal information management.
  • Implementation lessons include the need for sustained commitment and cultural change.

Sources and Further Reading

About the Author

DRK
Dr. Robert Kim

Research Director, Open Government Platform

Comparative PolicyInternational AffairsAcademic ResearchGovernment Reform

Dr. Robert Kim is an internationally recognized scholar specializing in comparative transparency policy. His research examines how different governmental systems implement open government principles. ... Read full bio

Experience: 18+ years researching international transparency policy